|
EDITORIAL
Public Questions
By: Richard Johnston
11/03/07
MOUNT OLIVE (11/03/07) – On Tuesday’s ballot there
are four public questions. Each one is very important to the economy
of the state and the health of its residents. Voters should give
careful consideration to each and the consequences if any are
rejected.
Currently, a national organization of ultra
conservative Republicans, based in Washington, DC is organized under
the banner, “Americans for Prosperity.” They have been campaigning
in areas of New Jersey where they feel they are accepted, urging
voters to vote “no” on the three main questions. Regardless of the
merits of whether the spending programs are reasonable, the reasons
they state for their opposition are mostly fallacious and without
merit.
In New Jersey they have been on a three day
statewide bus tour of diners to “Take Back New Jersey.” They say
they’ve posted thousands of signs in communities across the state.
The New Jersey branch is led by Bogota (Bergen
County) Mayor Steve Lonegan, generally in the forefront of excessive
right wing causes, and who was soundly defeated for the Republican
nomination in the 2005 gubernatorial election. His mantra on just
about everything is “reckless and irresponsible big spending.
The first question proposes that the added 1%
increase in the sales tax last year be totally dedicated to property
tax relief and tax reform.
Lonegan and his followers (one of whom is Morris
County Assemblyman Michael Patrick Carroll) make the argument that
if approved, the money would be used to condemn older buildings and
land under eminent domain for new housing and businesses. It’s
simply not true. Carroll is not a member, but he too is urging
defeat of all three questions.
Question 2 is arguably the most important. It
concerns authorizing the sale of $450 million in state obligation
bonds over 10 years for grants to fund stem cell research projects.
If approved institutions of higher education and other entities in
the state conducting scientific and medical research would be able
to apply and receive funds to research such diseases and severe
injuries as Alzheimer’s, cancer, diabetes, Lou Gehrig’s and
Parkinson’s diseases, sickle cell anemia and spinal cord injuries.
Question 3. Green Acres, Farmland, Blue Acres and
Historic Preservation. The State would issue bonds in the amount of
$200 million to provide monies to acquire and develop lands for
recreation and conservation; preserve farmland for agricultural or
horticultural use and production and acquire for recreation and
conservation purposes properties and flooded areas of the Delaware,
Passaic and Raritan rivers and their tributaries that are prone to
or having incurred flood or storm damage and funding historic
preservation projects and providing the ways and mans to pay the
interest on the debt and also to pay and discharge the principal.
Question 4 would amend the constitution to delete
the phrase “idiot or insane person” and replace it with “person who
has been adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction to lack
the capacity to understand the act of voting” in describing those
persons who shall be denied the right to vote.
As to the stem cell question, Joseph Seneca, Ph.D,
a Rutgers economist recently released the results of a detailed
analysis that estimates the state will reap nearly more than $2.2
billion in direct economic benefits from the investment. He points
out that if the private sector matches the funds it would add
another $2 billion to the economy. And, finally, he concludes, if
the research is successful in providing effective therapies for any
six diseases being researched the state would save more than $72
billion in health care costs. “It’s the most important of the four
questions,” he said.
Another Rutgers Neuroscientist, Dr. Wise Young,
chairman of the Neuroscience W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative
Neuroscience at Rutgers, points to what will be if the question is
not passed. All experts, he says, agree that stem cells represent
the future of therapeutics. Much of New Jersey’s economy depends on
this industry, he says. This state wasn’t the first to fund stem
cell research. Many other states have moved ahead. California has
invested $3 billion to fund human embryonic stem cell research; New
York passed a $650 million bond issue for re-generative medicine
(stem cell research); Connecticut is investing $100 million and
Maryland $25 million a year… If the bond issue doesn’t pass, he
says, New Jersey will lose is its therapeutic industry.
According to Dr. Young…therapeutics companies move
to where the research is. If a laboratory spends a million a year
and there are 100 laboratories in the state doing stem cell related
work that’s $100 million added to the state’s economy. If the
referendum fails and those labs move out of the state that would be
a $100 million a year loss to the economy.
There would be additional benefits for the state
if the referendum passes, he said. There would be funds to support
clinical trials. Affected people would not have to wait for
therapies to come to the state or have to go out of the state for
clinical trials. The investment would build and strengthen
universities in the state as well as research institutions.
The other benefits, of course, are priceless, he
said. What is it worth for people to be free from having to take
insulin injections for the rest of their lives, therapies that can
make people walk after brain and spinal cord injury and treatments
that can slow or reverse Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s diseases…what is
the value of having cured people, he asks.
Contrary to what critics charge, the referendum
explicitly forbids use of the funds for research that produces
clones of humans, including human fetuses by somatic cell nuclear
transfer. The funds will support all types of stem cell research
including research involving umbilical cord blood and bone marrow
stem cells. All the research will be competitively awarded only
after rigorous independent peer and ethical review of the research
applications. Only the best science will be funded, he said
|